Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!brl-adm!caip!sri-spam!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!decwrl!glacier!navajo!rokicki From: rokicki@navajo.UUCP Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: Memory board timings Message-ID: <748@navajo.STANFORD.EDU> Date: Sun, 20-Jul-86 20:50:34 EDT Article-I.D.: navajo.748 Posted: Sun Jul 20 20:50:34 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 22-Jul-86 00:12:53 EDT References: <25@unc.unc.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Stanford University Lines: 43 Summary: NEW CardCo Timings CardCo, with strapping problem: >> >> 512K machine, 1.1 988 dhrystones >> 1536K machine, 1.1 674 dhrystones >> Loss 31.8% >> 512K machine, 1.2 beta II 983 dhrystones >> 1536K machine, 1.2 beta II 664 dhrystones >> Loss 32.5% >> Comspec board: > 512K machine, 1.1 975.04 dhrys/sec = 51.28 secs for 50000 cycles > 2.5M machine, 1.1 967.49 dhrys/sec = 51.68 secs for 50000 cycles > Comparison: 99.23% of top speed = 0.77% Loss > > 512K machine, 1.2 Beta II 976.56 dhrys/sec = 51.20 secs for 50000 cycles > 2.5M machine, 1.2 Beta II 963.58 dhrys/sec = 51.89 secs for 50000 cycles > Comparison: 98.67% of top speed = 1.33% Loss I just fixed my CardCo board (my soldering iron is still hot), and these are the new updated timings: 512K machine, 1.1 988 dhrystones 1.5M machine, 1.1 938 dhrystones 94.9% of top speed = 5.1% loss 512K machine, 1.2 Beta II 983 dhrystones 1.5M machine, 1.2 Beta II 933 dhrystones 94.9% of top speed = 5.1% loss So, it's taking about 5% away; sounds like refresh delays. I suspect that this 5% will come back with interest on normal applications which access the disk and therefore use the coprocessors, though. I also decided to run the Mandlebrot set and see what improvement I noticed there. Here are the timings for mse (from the Fish disks) on a 640x200x4 screen, when the reset both window and region menu option is selected, for one scan of the window: 512K machine, 1.1 56m 4s 1.5M machine, 1.1 31m13s Speedup: 1.796 (79.6%) Not bad! -tom