Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!caip!clyde!cbatt!neoucom!wtm From: wtm@neoucom.UUCP (Bill Mayhew) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: Things that break with the MC68010 Message-ID: <236@neoucom.UUCP> Date: Fri, 25-Jul-86 23:22:59 EDT Article-I.D.: neoucom.236 Posted: Fri Jul 25 23:22:59 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 26-Jul-86 06:16:04 EDT References: <966@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <901@hoptoad.uucp> <2659@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU> Organization: Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine Lines: 40 Summary: E-A copy protection ---Munch here, etc...--- I've had a cuple of E-A products. 1 on 1, and Dpaint. Enjoyed them both, and they're wonderful examples of getting a lot out of the Amiga. Now the bad part is that the algorithm that E-A uses is real slow and rather unreliable. I've been though several copies of both programs. It seems like the disks break after 20 to 30 boots of the programs. It looks like they decode some part of the program and switch its physical location on the disk every time the protected program is run. It also looks like the funky blocks are not noted in the file system as used blocks which makes them vulnerable for trashing by legitimate writes to the disk. I can already hear you say that one shouldn't write to such a valuable disk. What about preferences for dpaint? I got a new printer, and *had* to change them. About 5 boots later, the disk died. E-A admits that writing to the dpaint disk is a bad idea. They had nothing to offer about the problem of changing prefs. They recommended booting from a w.b. disk with the desired prefs-- this turns out to be a pain on the system I'm using which has only one floppy. I called E-A on the phone and complained rather bitterly. They did relent, and send me new disks which they claimed were better than the first batch. Experience suggests that this is not true. They also blamed "the software duplicating house" for the problems related to the copyproof scheme. I think my carping might have actually done a little good, as I got back a rather long hand written letter from the v.p. of software development at E-A. Now if everyone would complain about how obnoxious their software is because of the protection used... Bill N. E. Ohio Universities College of Medicine Division of Basic Medical Sciences