Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!lll-crg!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!hplabs!felix!bytebug From: bytebug@felix.UUCP (Roger L. Long) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Status of mod.mac.{binaries,sources} Message-ID: <1327@felix.UUCP> Date: Mon, 7-Jul-86 11:50:15 EDT Article-I.D.: felix.1327 Posted: Mon Jul 7 11:50:15 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 8-Jul-86 05:45:52 EDT Reply-To: macintosh@felix.UUCP (Roger L. Long) Organization: FileNet Corp., Costa Mesa, CA Lines: 50 As moderator of mod.mac.{binaries,sources}, I wanted to let people know that things are finally being posted! Here is the list of articles posted thus far: 12 Apr 86 <1056@felix.UUCP> mod.mac.binaries the "famous" Amiga Bouncing Ball Demo (for the Mac) 27 Jun 86 <1290@felix.UUCP> mod.mac.binaries Lord of the Rings Finder (System 3.2/Finder 5.3 ONLY!) 7 Jul 86 <1324@felix.UUCP> mod.mac.binaries columb.pit.Hqx (1 of 3) 7 Jul 86 <1325@felix.UUCP> mod.mac.binaries columb.pit.Hqx (2 of 3) 7 Jul 86 <1326@felix.UUCP> mod.mac.binaries columb.pit.Hqx (3 of 3) I'd like to encourage you to use the moderated groups for your postings, as I've been told that net.sources.mac will disappear in the upcoming reorganization of the newsgroups. I also wanted to share some decisions I've had to make recently in rejecting a couple of submissions. This should give you an idea about my moderation policy as it exists so far. First there was a submission of a rather interesting little desk accessory that would speak, via Macintalk, every once in awhile. Nothing was wrong with the desk accessory itself, but the submission was in PackIt format, and included Macintalk. My understanding is that Macintalk was part of a software supplement put out by Apple, and is copyrighted. I've asked that the person who submitted this desk accessory to re-PackIt it without Macintalk. Next, was an editor called FastEddie2.5. Now FastEddie is shareware, which in itself isn't enough to keep something from being posted. My own feeling about shareware is that you are under no LEGAL obligation to pay whatever fee is being requested by the shareware author. On the other hand, if you find something useful, and the fee is reasonable, pay it so that the author is encouraged to produce more software. The point is, there is a fine line between using the net to distribute useful stuff and using the net to distribute a commercial product. FastEddie's problem was that it was a serial numbered "demo" version. What happens is when you buy FastEddie, you get an unrestricted full version, and a demo version. You are encouraged to post or distribute your demo version to the world. Then, when the author gets an order that includes the serial number of your demo version, you get a percentage of the profits. Now *that* seems a little too commercial for my tastes, so I've rejected FastEddie. I'd like to thank those of you supporting mod.mac.{sources,binaries}, both readers and submitters.