Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!vecpyr!amd!sco!ericg From: ericg@sco.UUCP (Eric Griswold of QA) Newsgroups: net.micro.pc,net.games.hack Subject: Re: Update on HACK for SCO XENIX Message-ID: <194@sco.UUCP> Date: Wed, 30-Jul-86 00:09:07 EDT Article-I.D.: sco.194 Posted: Wed Jul 30 00:09:07 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 31-Jul-86 03:46:01 EDT References: <347@cullvax.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: The Santa Cruz Operation, Santa Cruz, CA Lines: 37 Xref: mnetor net.micro.pc:5968 net.games.hack:1964 > In the last few weeks I have been trying off and on to get HACK to > build under XENIX. I got everything to compile cleanly using the large > model of the compiler, but linking is another matter. > > Using ld directly seems fruitless. It complains about hundreds of > modules not being found. I then tried using cc to drive the linker. It > seemed to work better until I got the message: > > /bin/ld: Too many segments > Input File: /lib/Llibc.a(ungetc.o.c) pos: 213bb Record type: 98 > *** Error code -109 > > Of course the manual doesn't document such errors. I'd call SCO, but > they only provide support for 30 days. Besides, they couldn't even > answer a simple question of current versions when I first got the > product. This copy of XENIX is my employer's. I'm thinking of getting a > machine of my own to run XENIX (or UNIX) on, but haven't found the right > thing yet... > > If anyone knows how to get around this problem, I'd really like to hear > from you. If anyone wants a copy of hack that compiles and runs on SCO XENIX V, I ported it earlier this year. Send me a request and I will send you a shar file. Eric Griswold SCO Technical Support -- +------ Eric Griswold | Home of the Mellow Bit Twiddlers .--+---- Santa Cruz, Ca. ' | {ihnp4, cithep, amd}!sco!ericg | +------ { _} Disclaimer: Nothing I ever say in real life is taken seriously ------- by my company, why should this?