Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!think!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!cca!lmi-angel!wsr
From: wsr@lmi-angel.UUCP (Wolfgang Rupprecht)
Newsgroups: net.news.adm
Subject: Re: Jamie's Junker -- All the News that Fits
Message-ID: <71@lmi-angel.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 2-Jul-86 17:53:42 EDT
Article-I.D.: lmi-ange.71
Posted: Wed Jul  2 17:53:42 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 5-Jul-86 05:36:48 EDT
References: <282@ubc-cs.UUCP>
Reply-To: wsr@lmi-angel.UUCP (Wolfgang Rupprecht)
Organization: LISP Machine, Inc (Cambridge Engineering HQ)
Lines: 11

Clearly junker should be (repeatedly) applied to its own sources. Tis
only fitting.

Why not put a quota on newsgroups, with those extra articles put in
*tommorrows* send queue? Since the number of articles that people
write increases with the number that they read, this would have a
similar effect to lowering the moderation rods (in a nuclear reactor).

Is this just as crazy?
-- 
Wolfgang Rupprecht	{harvard|decvax!cca|mit-eddie}!lmi-angel!wsr