Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!topaz!steiner
From: steiner@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Dave Steiner)
Newsgroups: net.news.adm
Subject: Re: hi, back for more abuse
Message-ID: <5302@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Tue, 8-Jul-86 16:27:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: topaz.5302
Posted: Tue Jul  8 16:27:52 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 9-Jul-86 03:03:02 EDT
References: <299@ubc-cs.UUCP>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 26

So far I haven't seen a need to add my no vote to using Junker.  But
as I've read the messages I haven't seen any mention of what I
consider the main reason for not using it.  Each news message has some
information content (some more than others of course ;-).  I find it
*totally unacceptable* to have a program running that will 


[Junker: message to long, middle removed.]


		pologise to getting too long winded.  

Hopefully you can see my point.  It makes messages totally worthless
(or at least has the potential to do so).  You might as well dump the
messages on the floor or just remove the newsgroup because reading
them will not be worth the trouble anymore.

Please add a :-) (or a :-( ) to my use of the Junker message in the
middle.  This probably isn't the way it actually does it's job but I
think you get the idea.

ds
-- 

uucp:   ...{harvard, seismo, ut-sally, sri-iu, ihnp4!packard}!topaz!steiner
arpa:   Steiner@RUTGERS.ARPA or Steiner@RED.RUTGERS.EDU