Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!im4u!ut-sally!husc6!yale!decvax!tektronix!tekig5!petel
From: petel@tekig5.UUCP (Pete Lancashire)
Newsgroups: net.news.sa,net.news.adm,net.wanted
Subject: Re: Looking for information on PUBLIC ACCESS USENET sites ...
Message-ID: <935@tekig5.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-Jul-86 00:12:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekig5.935
Posted: Tue Jul 22 00:12:28 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 23-Jul-86 07:18:53 EDT
References: <867@mit-trillian.MIT.EDU>
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR
Lines: 24
Xref: watmath net.news.sa:347 net.news.adm:855 net.wanted:9233
Summary: I'm paying for Public access ?

In article <867@mit-trillian.MIT.EDU>, henry@mit-trillian.MIT.EDU (Henry Mensch) writes:
> I would like to compile a *definitive* list of Usenet sites which
> provide service to the "general public."  This list will (hopefully)
> be published once a month along with the other lists posted to
> mod.newslists.

>  -----edited------

> Henry Mensch     |   Technical Writer  | MIT/Project Athena
> henry@athena.mit.edu          ..!mit-eddie!mit-athena!henry

PLEASE FOLLOWUP TO: net.followup

Now I even have to question the future of USENET, what do the big sites
think of public access ? I as a paying customer at Tektronix and soon at
home (not only a node but as one who will be feeding at least 4 other
sites) just can't feel at ease with the local cbbs type junk that could
end up on the net, it's bad enough now.

Pete Lancashire   ...!tektronix!tekig5!petel
Tektronix Inc.
next month...
SA at Tek   (soon to be [admin,petel]@teksce.TEK.UUCP)
SA at Home  (soon ...!tektronix!oregon![petel,admin,usenet])