Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!caip!princeton!allegra!ulysses!cbosgd!ihnp4!chinet!randy
From: randy@chinet.UUCP (randy)
Newsgroups: net.news.sa,net.news.adm,net.wanted
Subject: Re: Looking for information on PUBLIC ACCESS USENET sites ...
Message-ID: <438@chinet.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 23-Jul-86 10:39:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: chinet.438
Posted: Wed Jul 23 10:39:28 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 25-Jul-86 00:17:04 EDT
References: <867@mit-trillian.MIT.EDU> <935@tekig5.UUCP>
Reply-To: randy@chinet.UUCP (Randy Suess-)
Organization: chi-net, Public Access UN*X, Chicago IL
Lines: 23
Xref: mnetor net.news.sa:254 net.news.adm:602 net.wanted:3515

In article <935@tekig5.UUCP> petel@tekig5.UUCP (Pete Lancashire) writes:
>
>Now I even have to question the future of USENET, what do the big sites
>think of public access ? I as a paying customer at Tektronix and soon at
>home (not only a node but as one who will be feeding at least 4 other
>sites) just can't feel at ease with the local cbbs type junk that could
>end up on the net, it's bad enough now.
>
>Pete Lancashire   ...!tektronix!tekig5!petel

	Give me a break!  The quality of stuff coming out of my
"Public Access U*IX" system is magnitudes better than the comment
you just made..

	Not that it makes a difference, but this "bbs" feeds a full news
feed to 5 large sites, including Ill Bell.

-- 
.. that's the biz, sweetheart...
Randy Suess
chinet - Public Access UN*X
(312) 545 7535 (h) (312) 283 0559 (system)
..!ihnp4!chinet!randy