Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!inuxd!keen
From: keen@inuxd.UUCP (D Keen)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.sci,net.politics
Subject: Re: Libertarianism, Objectivism and Shopping Malls
Message-ID: <913@inuxd.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 23-Jul-86 09:34:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: inuxd.913
Posted: Wed Jul 23 09:34:14 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 25-Jul-86 19:58:05 EDT
References: <512@midas.UUCP> <5819@alice.uUCp>
Organization: AT&T Consumer Products, Indianapolis
Lines: 13
Xref: watmath net.women:11550 net.sci:1357 net.politics:17668

> Jeff Winslow says: "It's not hard to see why the issue of free speech in
> an area that to all appearances is no different than a street or a park
> is such a thorny legal problem."
> 
> My answer is simple: the shopping malls I've seen are very different
> in appearance from a street or a park.  For example, they tend to
> be locked up when their owners aren't around.

Just as a point of information I know of several parks that are
also locked during non-visiting hours.  Try again.

Don Keen
AT&T - which should be locked during all hours.