Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!caip!nike!oliveb!epimass!jbuck From: jbuck@epimass.UUCP (Joe Buck) Newsgroups: net.physics,net.sci,net.philosophy Subject: Re: A Sane Man Proposes A Time Travel Experiment Message-ID: <340@epimass.UUCP> Date: Tue, 29-Jul-86 22:21:19 EDT Article-I.D.: epimass.340 Posted: Tue Jul 29 22:21:19 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 30-Jul-86 20:54:39 EDT References: <289@axiom.UUCP> <5723@lanl.ARPA> <5594@sun.uucp> Reply-To: jbuck@epimass.UUCP (Joe Buck) Organization: Entropic Processing, Inc., Cupertino, CA Lines: 43 Xref: mnetor net.physics:2497 net.sci:1107 net.philosophy:2225 >In article <5723@lanl.ARPA> dxm@lanl.ARPA (Douglas Miller) writes: >>Time travel violates the conservation of mass and energy laws... In article <5594@sun.uucp> lyang@sun.UUCP (Larry Yang) writes: >I used to believe this argument, too, 'til I got my brain out of the >classical view of the universe. Consider time as an additional dimension. >Now just consider time travel as moving mass/energy from one "point" >in the space-time to another. Thus , mass/energy is conserved in this new >space-time "universe". Sorry, conservation of mass/energy applies at any instant of time, and region of space. It has never been observed that the mass/energy decreases at one instant, and increases at the next, except at the level of elementary particles. The uncertainty principle lets you do this though. Many people are familiar with (delta x)(delta p) >= h but there's also (delta E)(delta t) >= h That is, you can violate the conservation of energy if you do it for a short enough time, since the energy of a system isn't precisely defined unless you measure it forever (t -> infinity). Unfortunately, the time in which you're allowed to have an extra gram of matter around is pretty miniscule. On the other hand, since it's probabilistic, if you wait long enough (10^big-number times the age of the universe) it might happen. In the vacuum, particles and antiparticles are constantly appearing and annihilating each other out of nothing. One way of interpreting this is that the positron is an electron travelling backward in time. So the positron-electron pair is only a single particle, travelling in a little circle in space-time. One could imagine a macroscopic object travelling in a loop in space-time. No microscopic laws would be violated; only the second law of thermodynamics (but this is a statistical law, so if you wait long enough...). An observer in a "normal" space-time path might see this like a pair-production event: suddenly two identical but opposite objects appear, move in some way, collide, and disappear. -- - Joe Buck {ihnp4!pesnta,oliveb,nsc!csi}!epimass!jbuck Entropic Processing, Inc., Cupertino, California