Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!ll-xn!cit-vax!amdahl!bnrmtv!timlee From: timlee@bnrmtv.UUCP (Timothy Lee) Newsgroups: net.women,net.sci Subject: Clarification about college admissions Message-ID: <551@bnrmtv.UUCP> Date: Tue, 29-Jul-86 19:59:58 EDT Article-I.D.: bnrmtv.551 Posted: Tue Jul 29 19:59:58 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 1-Aug-86 07:46:32 EDT Distribution: net Organization: Bell Northern Research, Mtn. View, CA Lines: 27 Keywords: Re: Why aren't there any [female|black] [physicists|whatever] ? Xref: watmath net.women:11691 net.sci:1400 Cheryl@batcomputer and someone at Stevens Tech seemed to have misinterpreted one of my postings about female|black physicists. This is what I mean: The colleges and universities are more interested in increasing the NUMBER of female|black|etc students than in helping the female|black|etc students themselves. What I was saying applied mainly to public schools which have various governmental agencies counting female|black|etc students. These agencies (such as state legislatures which give out money) measure progress of female|black|etc students by the NUMBER ENROLLED at the school, NOT by how well they do there or how they become eligible for admission. Thus, to please these powers, the schools must admit and enroll FOR AS LONG AS POSSIBLE as many female|black|etc students out of an applicant pool which contains only a few really qualified female|black|etc students. As I recall, this discussion about "Why aren't there any [female|black] physicists?" started out as a discussion about why there were so few female|black people within the group of people who were interested in science in general and physics in particular, with the result being that so few female|black people entering the applicant pool of physics majors. This is the root of the problem; without improving the female|black|etc's standing within the applicant pool (for whatever, including college admissions), one is just trying to conceal the problem rather than solve it. This means looking at the K-12 schools, at the home environment, and at peer influences (yes, I know about Cheryl's chemistry AP example). I think this takes us back to where we started... what influences are keeping females|blacks|etcs from being interested|good in physics|college(preperation)?