Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!topaz!husc6!harvard!panda!genrad!decvax!tektronix!reed!omssw2!ogcvax!sequent!brian
From: brian@sequent.UUCP (Brian Godfrey)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.sci
Subject: Re: life of nuke wastes
Message-ID: <1995@sequent.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 30-Jul-86 17:26:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: sequent.1995
Posted: Wed Jul 30 17:26:12 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Aug-86 07:46:22 EDT
References: <1970@brl-smoke.ARPA> <320@rtech.UUCP>
Reply-To: brian@sequent.UUCP (Brian Godfrey)
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems Inc, Portland, OR
Lines: 10
Xref: watmath net.politics:17926 net.sci:1424

>Dammit folks, this comes up over and over, and is refuted over and
>over.  Once and for all, FACE FACTS:
>
>    PLUTONIUM IS NOT EVEN *CLOSE* TO BEING THE MOST TOXIC SUBSTANCE.

   Who cares if it is the *most* toxic? Can plutonium kill me? Yes. Hey, 
folks, dead is dead. Just how much more dead can one toxin make you than 
another?

--Brian