Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!cbosgd!ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!beth From: beth@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP (JB) Newsgroups: net.women,net.sci Subject: Driving men out of AP Chemistry Message-ID: <453@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> Date: Thu, 31-Jul-86 17:36:11 EDT Article-I.D.: sphinx.453 Posted: Thu Jul 31 17:36:11 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Aug-86 09:20:52 EDT References: <4368@decwrl.DEC.COM> <719@batcomputer.TN.CORNELL.EDU> <326@encore.UUCP> <2274@ihlpg.UUCP> Reply-To: beth@sphinx.UUCP (JB) Distribution: net Organization: U.of Chicago Computation Center, Operating Systems Group Lines: 32 Xref: watmath net.women:11796 net.sci:1427 [Ob/maintaining that certain air of savoir-faire] In article <2274@ihlpg.UUCP> kapa@ihlpg.UUCP (Perkins) writes: >> In article <719@batcomputer.TN.CORNELL.EDU> cheryl@batcomputer.UUCP (cheryl) writes: >> >[Cheryl's story about discouraging males from taking AP Chem in >> > high school, and driving out one of the ones who took it anyway. -BDC] > >Another example of something that when men do it, it is sexist; >when women do it, it expresses solidarity. "This time for sure." "What time is it?" "Time" is the same word in both sentences - it must mean the same thing, eh? I'm not saying I agree with what Cheryl did (I don't think I do). But there is such a thing as context, and it makes a difference in how one interprets things. If operating under the assumption that something is true will help make it true, then assuming men and women are really operating in the same context, and therefore judging men's and women's actions by the same standard, makes sense. But in fact, men and women are operating in very different contexts, and if you want a realistic appraisal of an individuals actions, you have to take into account where that person is coming from. Just a thought. -- --JB ((Just) Beth Christy, U. of Chicago, ..!ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!beth) "There's got to be another world, oh yeah. Boop, boop, boop, baby." --The Roches