Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!mnetor!seismo!caip!unirot!ooblick
From: ooblick@unirot.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.legal,net.singles,net.social,net.women
Subject: Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sodomy
Message-ID: <868@unirot.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 16-Jul-86 17:02:32 EDT
Article-I.D.: unirot.868
Posted: Wed Jul 16 17:02:32 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 16-Jul-86 22:44:32 EDT
References: <3098@jhunix.UUCP> <14682@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <2146@hammer.UUCP> <322@hp-sdd.UUCP> <890@magic.DEC.COM> <453@weitek.UUCP>
Reply-To: ooblick@unirot.UUCP (Mikki Barry)
Distribution: net
Organization: Public Access Un*x, Piscataway NJ (The Soup Kitchen)
Lines: 22
Keywords: something to keep in mind
Xref: utcs net.legal:3972 net.singles:14140 net.social:1161 junk:1396

In article <453@weitek.UUCP> robert@weitek.UUCP (Robert Plamondon) writes:
>>> >In article <318@hp-sdd.UUCP> nick@hp-sdd.UUCP (Nick Flor) writes:
>>> >In this light, does it change your opinion of the ruling?  Do you wish the
>>> >government to certify ok and not ok sexual habits?  
>
>>> In article <848@unirot.UUCP> ooblick@unirot.UUCP (Mikki Barry) writes:
>>> But to seriously answer your questions:
>>> NO and YES. 
>
>>> The line has to be drawn somewhere.  Hasn't anyone else noticed the moral
>>> decay in this country, or is everyone afraid of getting flamed or called
>>> a Bible thumper?  

TIME OUT HERE!  I sense operator error.  I authored the first
quote (the question about government intervention), and Nick posted the
yes government should step in part.

I wouldn't want to damage my reputation, you know.

Mikki Barry
HASA (Heathen and Atheistic Scum Alliance)
-----------------