Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!seismo!rochester!cornell!uw-beaver!fluke!tron
From: tron@fluke.UUCP (Peter Barbee)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.social
Subject: Re: No fault divorce
Message-ID: <1547@vax1.fluke.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 24-Jul-86 15:44:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: vax1.1547
Posted: Thu Jul 24 15:44:06 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 26-Jul-86 06:20:37 EDT
References: <1056@watdragon.UUCP> <15040@ucla-cs.ARPA> <4054@sun.uucp> <24@iwsam.UUCP> <26@iwsam.UUCP>
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA
Lines: 23
Xref: watmath net.women:11571 net.social:1236

There were so many >s in this posting I couldn't figure out who said
what.  But somebody typed in some real bullshit, so here goes - 

>> > 	Firstly, isn't it alittle bit strong to call people 'losers'
>> > 	in marriage. Why? Just becasue they haven't reached the 'high-level'
>> > 	or marriage that you have?  Do you think you're better than them?
>> 
>People can probably be called 'losers' if their marriages failed
>i.e. ended in divorce.  
>...  I think it's like getting fired from a job:
>it may not be all your fault, there may be extenuating circumstances,
>but it's not what you would call a success.

The world is black and white, the world is black and white, the sky is falling,
the sky is falling.

Get the point?

I can only hope that whenever something you do doesn't work for the best
someone reminds you you're a failure.  Or maybe you'll change your viewpoint.

Care,
Peter B