Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ll-xn!cit-vax!amdahl!amdcad!linda
From: linda@amdcad.UUCP (Linda Seltzer)
Newsgroups: net.legal,net.singles,net.social,net.women,net.motss
Subject: Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sodomy
Message-ID: <12507@amdcad.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 29-Jul-86 17:41:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: amdcad.12507
Posted: Tue Jul 29 17:41:25 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 30-Jul-86 01:45:08 EDT
References: <3098@jhunix.UUCP> <14682@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <2146@hammer.UUCP> <17599@ucla-cs.ARPA>
Distribution: net
Organization: AMDCAD, Sunnyvale, CA
Lines: 15
Keywords: something to keep in mind
Summary: Georgia sodomy law and heterosexual couples
Xref: mnetor net.legal:2849 net.singles:8741 net.social:749 net.women:4912 net.motss:1997

> In article <857@unirot.UUCP> ooblick@unirot.UUCP (Mikki Barry) writes:
> >I, for one, resent the government telling me and my husband what we can
> >and can't do in bed.  Does anyone else think sexual freedom is an
> >unreasonable wish?
> 
> I am just wondering: don't heterosexual Georgians ever have oral and anal 
> sex? 

I remember reading in the newspaper that a heterosexual couple had
originally participated in the challenge to the sodomy law.  Their
complaint was thrown out by the court, because it was determined that
there was virtually no chance they would ever be prosecuted for sodomy.
This raised the question of equal protection under the law.

Did anyone else read the same thing?