Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!lll-crg!lll-lcc!well!ewhac From: ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab) Newsgroups: net.test Subject: Re: This is a test (of purity) Message-ID: <1455@well.UUCP> Date: Sat, 19-Jul-86 05:04:12 EDT Article-I.D.: well.1455 Posted: Sat Jul 19 05:04:12 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 20-Jul-86 05:41:11 EDT References: <14776@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <363@nike.UUCP> <817@ucbcad.BERKELEY.EDU> <2192@gondor.UUCP> <13@eneevax.UUCP> Reply-To: ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab) Distribution: na Organization: Rachek Institute for Research, Technology, and Fun Lines: 35 Keywords: purity In article <13@eneevax.UUCP> hsu@eneevax.UUCP (Dave Hsu) writes: >In article <2192@gondor.UUCP> jte@gondor.UUCP (Jon Eckhardt) writes: >>In article <817@ucbcad.BERKELEY.EDU> korn@pavepaws.UUCP (Peter "Arrgh" Korn) writes: >>> >>>>In article <14776@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> muir writes: >>>>>I score 72.25. How about you? >>>I'm assuming that that figure is a %. I scored 65.5% >>>Peter >>Could you please repost the purity test? >>Thanks, >Geez guys, I'll re-send it to net.rumor. Once. >BTW, when you say `score' it ALWAYS refers to %. No matter which >version you take. > >still the highest score of any bandykin at 86%, >-dave I've got you *ALL* beat: 92.75% And, no, I'm *not* kidding. I was brought up with a sense of morals (of course, it may have something to do with me being Catholic... :-). _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ ________ ___ \ /___--__ Leo L. Schwab ___ ___ /\ ---##\ ihnp4!ptsfa!well!ewhac / X \_____ | __ _---)) ..or.. / /_\-- -----+==____\ // \ _ well ---\ ___ ( o---+------------------O/ \/ \ dual ----> !unicom!ewhac \ / ___ \_ (`o ) hplabs -/ ("AE-wack") ____ \___/ \_/ Recumbent Bikes: "Work FOR? I don't work FOR The _O_n_l_y Way To Fly! anybody! I'm just having fun."