Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!micropro!ptsfa!ssl
From: ssl@ptsfa.UUCP (Sam Lok)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: UUCP USERFILE
Message-ID: <1487@ptsfa.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 29-Jul-86 12:53:23 EDT
Article-I.D.: ptsfa.1487
Posted: Tue Jul 29 12:53:23 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 30-Jul-86 20:54:57 EDT
References: <1759@brl-smoke.ARPA> <976@decuac.DEC.COM> <459@oracle.UUCP> <5431@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>
Reply-To: ssl@ptsfa.UUCP (Sam Lok)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Francisco
Lines: 18

In article <5431@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> hedrick@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Charles Hedrick) writes:
>
>By the way, is the new Userfile a feature of SVr2, SVr3, or HoneyDanber
>UUCP?  SVr3 hasn't had time to make it out through vendors yet, and the
>vendors I have talked to aren't yet sure which of the extra-cost ATT stuff
>such as HoneyDanber their users are really going to want.
>


Correct me if I am wrong, folks.  But there is no USERFILE in SVR2 UUCP.
I beleive we are ruuning HoneyDanber on our SVR2 3B2/400, and there is
a Permissions file instead of USERFILE.  The Permissions file provides
much more flexiblity than earlier verions UUCP's USERFILE.

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Sam Lok			{ihnp4,dual,qantel}!ptsfa!ssl