Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: Any body know networks supported for sysV 3.0
Message-ID: <2714@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 31-Jul-86 10:53:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.2714
Posted: Thu Jul 31 10:53:12 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Aug-86 04:15:43 EDT
References: <2544@brl-smoke.ARPA> <587@hropus.UUCP> <540@pyramid.UUCP> <1488@ptsfa.UUCP> <5666@sun.uucp>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 17

In article <5666@sun.uucp> guy@sun.uucp (Guy Harris) writes:
-- "AT&T Enhanced TCP/IP/WIN/3B
-
-At the last UniForum, they showed off a TCP/IP implementation for the 3B
-under S5R2.x Version y, for some valsue of "x" and "y".  It resembled the
-version you describe; it had "rlogin", "rsh", "rwho" and other Berkeley
-protocols as well as the usual DOD protocols (FTP, TELNET, SMTP).  They did
-provide an interface that's compatible with sockets (to some unspecified
-degree).
-
-This wasn't on top of streams, obviously.  Is this new version a version for
-S5R3 that runs on top of streams?  If so, they've either provided a protocol-
-to-network-interface interface or have taught the IP layer about Ethernet
-and X.25 headers (ecch).

What puzzles me is why Dennis Ritchie's streams-based TCP/IP
implementation doesn't seem to be becoming an AT&T product.