Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!ucbvax!MC.LCS.MIT.EDU!kfl%mx.lcs.mit.edu
From: kfl%mx.lcs.mit.edu@MC.LCS.MIT.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.politics
Subject: Mental illness
Message-ID: <12231711042.14.MCGREW@RED.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Mon, 18-Aug-86 02:35:31 EDT
Article-I.D.: RED.12231711042.14.MCGREW
Posted: Mon Aug 18 02:35:31 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 18-Aug-86 23:29:30 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: kfl%mx.lcs.mit.edu@mc.lcs.mit.edu
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 73
Approved: poli-sci@red.rutgers.edu


    From: Hank.Walker@unh.cs.cmu.edu

    I used to agree with a lot of what Libertarians espouse, but what
    really turned me off to them was their position on mental illness.

  So?  Can't you agree with us on some things and disgree on one or
  two?  Not all libertarians agree with my position on competency.

    [The position is] we shouldn't judge what is normal or abnormal
    behavior,

  Government shouldn't.  Individuals are free to judge, but not to
restrain people who seem nutty.

    and hence shouldn't restrain mentally ill people until they have
    or are in the process of committing a crime.

  That's right.  Who gets to decide what is normal or abnormal?  Are
some political beliefs abnormal?  Some religions?  None, you say?
Well, what about people who practice human sacrifice, surely they
should be restrained.  Yes, but only because human sacrifice is a
CRIME, not because it is crazy or abnormal.

    I'm not talking about people feeling a little down, or having
    troubles interacting with others, I'm talking real mental illness,
    like psychosis or schizophrenia, ...

  Or paranoia?

    the kind that can only be treated with drugs, not "talking
    therapy."

  You won't find three psychiatrists who will agree on who, if anyone,
can be cured by talking therapy, and who requires drugs, and what
drugs, and in what amount.
  Many psychiatrists even doubt the very existance of mental illness.
Read Thomas Szasz's _The Myth of Mental Illness_.  Heck of a science
where some of its practitioners doubt the existance of the subject
matter!
  There is hardly a trial in which a credentialed psychiatrist
testifies that someone is sane or insane in which another equally
credentialed psychiatrist doesn't testify the opposite.
  Yet you think that people should be imprisoned and drugged against
their will, possibly for life, based on one such psychiatrist's
opinion?  Even if they have hurt nobody and comitted no crime?

    The correct way to view them is as children.
    Would you let your children do whatever they wanted until they
    committed a crime?  Hardly.

  Our discussions on this list are about the correct political system
for ADULTS.  Which adults should be treated like children?  Those for
which a psychiatrist can be found to testify they are deranged?  You
want to make any bets what percent of the population that would be?

    Anyone who wants to know how living with the mentally ill really
    feels should read the My Turn column that appeared in Newsweek
    some months ago by a woman describing her mother's illness, the
    breakup of her parent's marriage, and finally her mother's
    suicide.

  What about those whose parents drink or smoke?  Those habits also
destroy lives.  Far more lives than mental illness destroys.  Should
they too be locked away?  Many psychiatrists have said that drinking
is a mental illness.  Some say the same about smoking.  Some say the
same about computer usage.
  It is pretty widely believed that Abraham Lincoln and Winston
Churchill suffered from clinical depression.  Should they have been
put away?
                                                              ...Keith

-------