Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!MC.LCS.MIT.EDU!kfl%mx.lcs.mit.edu
From: kfl%mx.lcs.mit.edu@MC.LCS.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: mod.politics
Subject: Property values
Message-ID: <12232189621.14.MCGREW@RED.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Tue, 19-Aug-86 22:24:26 EDT
Article-I.D.: RED.12232189621.14.MCGREW
Posted: Tue Aug 19 22:24:26 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 20-Aug-86 23:20:31 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: kfl%mx.lcs.mit.edu@mc.lcs.mit.edu
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 13
Approved: poli-sci@red.rutgers.edu


    From: fagin%ji@berkeley.edu (Barry S. Fagin)

    Your problem is that your confusing a drop in your property value
    with actual damage.  One is a violation of your rights,
    while the other is the result of other people's voluntary choices.

  Exactly.  Some say that having blacks move in next door lowers
property values.  If so, should a person have the right to prevent his
neighbor from selling or renting his house to blacks?
                                                              ...Keith

-------