Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!mordor!sri-spam!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!XEROX.COM!hibbert.pa From: hibbert.pa@XEROX.COM Newsgroups: mod.politics Subject: Re: Poli-Sci Digest V6 #51 Message-ID: <12233234012.16.MCGREW@RED.RUTGERS.EDU> Date: Sat, 23-Aug-86 22:01:27 EDT Article-I.D.: RED.12233234012.16.MCGREW Posted: Sat Aug 23 22:01:27 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 24-Aug-86 03:03:48 EDT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: hibbert.pa@xerox.com Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 32 Approved: poli-sci@red.rutgers.edu Just to add a few things to Kieth Lynch's reply to Eyal Mozes... To start with, I'd summarize my reaction thusly: Eyal said a lot of things that don't seem even remotely true. A reply seems needed only because the author spoke with such certainty. "Murray Rothbard, who is widely regarded as the intellectual leader of libertarianism, you can see that most of the views he holds on concrete issues - such as his praise for the PLO, his sympathetic evaluation of soviet foreign policy, and his view of the USA as the world's "main danger to peace and freedom" - are totally incompatible with genuine advocacy of individual rights, and identical with the views of most socialists." I would place Murray Rothbard as an intellectual leader among Libertarians, but one who holds many opinions that are quite controversial among libertarians. The ones you mention in particular are (mostly) ones that I don't agree with. Most of the times that I have heard Murray speak, he was specifically introduced (to libertarian audiences) as someone with whom everyone would have some disagreement. I believe his main claim to authority in in the field of economics. Eyal goes on to explain that "the correct approach to political theory is the one diametrically opposed to libertarianism's," and mentions in particular Ayn Rand's as one who follows this model. Rand is much more widely regarded as THE person who set out the principle's on which libertarianism is based. Chris -------