Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!ucbvax!XEROX.COM!hoffman.es From: hoffman.es@XEROX.COM.UUCP Newsgroups: mod.politics Subject: laundry list (non-discrimination policies) Message-ID: <12226921640.40.MCGREW@RED.RUTGERS.EDU> Date: Wed, 30-Jul-86 20:06:33 EDT Article-I.D.: RED.12226921640.40.MCGREW Posted: Wed Jul 30 20:06:33 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 31-Jul-86 17:20:55 EDT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: hoffman.es@xerox.com Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 25 Approved: poli-sci@red.rutgers.edu Return-Path: Date: 24 Jul 86 10:11:58 PDT (Thursday) From: Hoffman.es@Xerox.COM Subject: laundry list (non-discrimination policies) To: wild@SUN.COM (Will Doherty) From: Will Doherty As these characteristics [race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, etc.] become unimportant (at least as far as hiring, firing, etc.), then we can forget about pushing for protective laws. But we aren't there yet. Well, we certainly aren't. I proposed to do away with the "laundry list" of prohibited discrimination categories in favor of policies like, "Only job-related characteristics shall be considered in hiring, firing, and promotion decisions." But I readily admit this is idealistic. A further idealistic tenet of mine is that I help change the world toward my ideal by, as far as possible, being idealistic in my life and in my proposals. :-) -------