Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!ucbvax!ATHENA.MIT.EDU!rlk
From: rlk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.politics
Subject: Re:  Proposed amendment
Message-ID: <12226926182.16.MCGREW@RED.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Wed, 30-Jul-86 20:31:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: RED.12226926182.16.MCGREW
Posted: Wed Jul 30 20:31:30 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 31-Jul-86 17:41:51 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: rlk@athena.mit.edu
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 17
Approved: poli-sci@red.rutgers.edu

Return-Path: <rlk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 86 12:33:51 EDT
From: Robert L. Krawitz <rlk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU>
Sender: rlk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
To: fair@ucbarpa.berkeley.edu (Erik E. Fair)
Cc: Hoffman.es@xerox.com, KFL%MX.LCS.MIT.EDU@mc.lcs.mit.edu,
cc: JOSH@red.rutgers.edu, KIN%MX.LCS.MIT.EDU@mc.lcs.mit.edu,
cc: Reges@su-score.arpa
Subject: Re:  Proposed amendment

I'd say that you cana't make a blanket statement either way.  Depends
too much on the particular individual, the particular crime, etc.  All
circumstances have to be considered (not that I care to go into lots
of detail here right now).

Robert^Z
-------