Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!XEROX.COM!"Arthur_Axelrod.WBST128"
From: "Arthur_Axelrod.WBST128"@XEROX.COM
Newsgroups: mod.telecom
Subject: Charges for Unlisted Service
Message-ID: <8608102058.AA09083@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Mon, 4-Aug-86 16:38:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8608102058.AA09083
Posted: Mon Aug  4 16:38:30 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 10-Aug-86 23:42:55 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 13
Approved: telecom@xx.lcs.mit.edu


 	" Southern Bell doesn't charge for unlisted numbers if you
	also have a listed number.  (This is logical considering why they
	have a charge for unlisted numbers.)

	--henry schaffer  n c state univ"

Why does the TelCo have a charge for unlisted numbers?  I've never
really understood that.  Why is it logical to not charge for unlisting
one if you have another that is listed?
   Art Axelrod
   Xerox Webster Research Center