Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!mordor!sri-spam!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!LLL-TIS-GW.ARPA!mcb%lll-tis-b.ARPA
From: mcb%lll-tis-b.ARPA@LLL-TIS-GW.ARPA (Michael C. Berch)
Newsgroups: mod.telecom
Subject: Re: 10xxx from phone booths
Message-ID: <8608240932.AA15919@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Sat, 23-Aug-86 16:04:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8608240932.AA15919
Posted: Sat Aug 23 16:04:51 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 24-Aug-86 09:02:45 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: mcb%lll-tis-b.ARPA@lll-tis-gw.arpa (Michael C. Berch)
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 19
Approved: telecom@xx.lcs.mit.edu

> 	While on the topic of ESS: do any of you Pac-Tel'ers know when
> they plan to upgrade the last few exchanges???  On one of my phone
> lines I can't even direct-dial international calls.

My home is in the "Millbrae" central office area (415-697), and we
cannot perform IDDD, and do not have 1+ or 10xxx dialing. At a community 
fair PacBell had an information booth. When I asked about these items
they couldn't find our exchange in the scheduled list for Equal Access,
and said that some "would never be done" because the CO equipment is
too archaic.

Is this possible? Is there a certain data by which all access work must
be completed? Is this covered by the AT&T judgment or by state PUCs?
This isn't a rural crossbar exchange; it's right next to SF
International Airport...

Michael C. Berch
ARPA: mcb@lll-tis-b.ARPA
UUCP: {ihnp4,dual,sun}!lll-lcc!styx!mcb