Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hcrvx2.UUCP
Path: utzoo!hcrvx2!jimr
From: jimr@hcrvx2.UUCP (Jim Robinson)
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: Socialists
Message-ID: <2383@hcrvx2.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 2-Sep-86 19:17:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: hcrvx2.2383
Posted: Tue Sep  2 19:17:34 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 3-Sep-86 00:46:51 EDT
References: <225@mdivax1.UUCP> <334@ubc-cs.UUCP> <2368@hcrvx2.UUCP> <353@ubc-cs.UUCP> <2375@hcrvx2.UUCP> <190@miduet.gec-mi-at.co.uk>
Reply-To: jimr@hcrvx2.UUCP (Jim Robinson)
Organization: Human Computing Resources, Toronto
Lines: 18
Summary: 

In article <190@miduet.gec-mi-at.co.uk> adam@miduet (Adam Quantrill) writes:
>>Just out of curiosity how do the NDP and Britain's labour party differ.
>>Are both not beholden to the labour unions? Are both not non-militaristic
>>to the point of pacificism? []
>>
>>J.B. Robinson
>
>	I can't speak for the NDP but our beloved Labour party isn't 
>non-militaristic, on the contrary they would support a conventional army.
>They (quite rightly) just want to wash their hands of nuclear weapons.

Question: are they for unilateral or multilateral disarmament? - there is
a big difference. 

Also, would they do as our NDP say they would, and pull your country out
of NATO? 

J.B. Robinson