Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!vrdxhq!BMS-AT!stuart
From: stuart@BMS-AT.UUCP (Stuart D. Gathman)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: by-ref parameters, aggregate constants, etc
Message-ID: <174@BMS-AT.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 26-Aug-86 22:32:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: BMS-AT.174
Posted: Tue Aug 26 22:32:16 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 27-Aug-86 11:21:29 EDT
References: <522@bunny.UUCP> <6229@sun.uucp> <161@BMS-AT.UUCP> <3100@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Business Management Systems, Inc., Fairfax, VA
Lines: 19
Summary: I concur

In article <3100@umcp-cs.UUCP>, chris@umcp-cs.UUCP (Chris Torek) writes:

Inline functions are clearer, I think:

	inline int
	foo(x, y)
		int x, y;
 	{
 		float a = 0.0;

 		while (x)
 			a += y * x--;
 		return (a);
 	}

--
Yeah!  That is much better! (I just didn't think of it.)
-- 
Stuart D. Gathman	<..!seismo!{vrdxhq|dgis}!BMS-AT!stuart>