Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!hplabs!sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim
From: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith)
Newsgroups: net.micro.68k
Subject: Re: Re: BYTE "68000" issue
Message-ID: <3531@ism780c.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 10-Sep-86 22:02:27 EDT
Article-I.D.: ism780c.3531
Posted: Wed Sep 10 22:02:27 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 12-Sep-86 08:15:28 EDT
References: <1327@lsuc.UUCP> <710@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>
Reply-To: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith)
Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Santa Monica, CA
Lines: 16

In article <710@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> daveh@cbmvax.cbm.UUCP (Dave Haynie) writes:
> Incidently, as far as I've heard, none of the top 3 popular 68000
> systems support the TAS instruction.  The AMIGA executes a read
> cycle for TAS; I believe that it will crash either the Atari ST
> or Apple MAC.

Sounds like someone is using AS to de-assert DTACK rather than UDS and
LDS.  Is this correct?

In the micro lab class I took when I was a student at Caltech, about half
the 68k systems students designed had this problem.
-- 
I admit it!  I don't believe in Mary Worth!  I Lied!  HaHaHaHaHaHa!!!!!!

Tim Smith       USENET: sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim   Compuserve: 72257,3706
		Delphi or GEnie: mnementh