Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!well!kdd From: kdd@well.UUCP (Keith David Doyle) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Some questions and a Digi-Review Message-ID: <1679@well.UUCP> Date: Tue, 26-Aug-86 16:38:38 EDT Article-I.D.: well.1679 Posted: Tue Aug 26 16:38:38 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 27-Aug-86 10:56:56 EDT Reply-To: kdd@well.UUCP (Keith David Doyle) Organization: Whole Earth Lectronic Link, Sausalito CA Lines: 80 References: [.............] Questions: Does anyone have any good ideas of how to get RAW: keyboard data from THE cli window without having to open a second window? I found I could open the RAW: device for keyboard input so that I can check keystrokes as they occur (and not echo), but a new window is involved. If I am using this method for input and normal 'printf's for output, everything works ok, but it is confusing if you decide to switch to another window via mouse click and then back again, as you have to click on the little RAW: window which I have carefully shrunk to minimum size and moved out of the way instead of the display window where the printf's are going. I am trying to produce a simple CLI utility (more) and find that there seems to be no clean way to do it. One version I've seen opens its own window for both input and output but then must remove the window when you do a 'q' to exit, whereas I'd like to leave the last bit on the screen so I can peruse it further. Any ideas? Basically, I'm trying to do the same as the UNIX CBREAK. Well, as far as Digi-View is concerned, I saw one at a local computer store and decide to buy it. I have to say I'm pretty satisfied, especially considering the price. I already had a very good B&W camera, so I was halfway there anyway. So, for the benifit of youse guys out there, here's a review: I found it works pretty well once you've got the lighting and focusing and etc. all set up correctly. While trying it in the store, there was not enough light, and they just had a security type B&W camera with a fixed lens on a lightweight tripod, that was clumsy to try to point and aim at the flat artwork I brought for a test. I have a zoom and a set of closeup lenses which I found pretty indespensable while trying to do this kind of work. It appears that the Digi-View actually digitizes to 7 bits, and will then normalize (or whatever you call it) down to 4 bits which is very handy, as it will try the best it can to fit the picture it gets to the shade range you have to work with on the screen this way. Otherwise, you might find yourself having to ajust the heck out of the lighting or the video level or whatever to try to get a full range of shades out of it. There is a reasonable set of 'controls' that allow you to adjust brightness, contrast, sharpness, etc for b&w, and saturation, red, and blue for color. As a previous poster mentioned, I saw no way the hi-res software would support color if you did have >512k for it, maybe that is 1.1 which I guess I don't have yet. There are also 2 adjustments in the 'calibration' section that adjusts 'width' and 'sync'. The use of width is pretty obvious, but there is no mention of what to do with sync in the manual. I found that in lo-res I sometimes noticed a slight distortion on the right hand side of the screen and found that by adjusting the sync control it went away. Still don't have any idea of what it does though. I am quite satisfied with the ability of the hi-res mode to effectively capture an image, the lo-res mode is not bad, but a little grainer than I thought it might be, at least for most images. I guess without a real-time grabber sitting next to it to compare with I can't tell, but for $199.00 I'm not really complaining. The software is fairly rudimentary though does do its job ok. My main complaints are really only user-friendliness issues. In particular, there is no way to save the 'sync' and 'width' parameters once you get them setup right, so you have to keep ajusting them every time you enter the program. And, since the lo-res and hi-res programs are seperate, you may do that fairly often while trying lo-res and hi-res captures of the same image. In addition, it would seem that the two programs were probably written by different people, as the 'width' parameter works opposite on the two programs. On one, moving width up makes the picture wider, on the other makes it narrower. I found it a useful feature that you can save a rgb picture as the 3 planes of 7 bit data, so you can later tweak the color controls and etc. to your hearts content perhaps then saving the image with several different color adjustments. And one final note, there was no information on what the histograms are telling me, they're there, but I guess I'll have to go find a book on image processing or something to try to figure out if I can make any use of them. Keith Doyle ihnp4!ptsfa!well!kdd