Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!CORY.BERKELEY.EDU!dillon
From: dillon@CORY.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: 68000 Memory Managment
Message-ID: <8608282009.AA19390@cory.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Thu, 28-Aug-86 16:09:31 EDT
Article-I.D.: cory.8608282009.AA19390
Posted: Thu Aug 28 16:09:31 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 29-Aug-86 05:32:43 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 13


	I would like to point out that memory manegment is not usually worth
the price in small microcomputers UNLESS it goes hand in hand with 
multi-processing.  So:

	(1) The IBM PC is not inherently multi-processing.
	(2) The ST is not inherently multi-processing.
	(3) The Amiga OS is not designed to accomodate a MMU.

	I do agree that the Amiga would have been a nicer machine if it had
been designed around a MMU, but neither the hardware or software was.

							-Matt