Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!caip!cbmvax!grr
From: grr@cbmvax.cbm.UUCP (George Robbins)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: BYTE issue of September 86 focuses on the 68000
Message-ID: <679@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 30-Aug-86 12:07:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: cbmvax.679
Posted: Sat Aug 30 12:07:28 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 31-Aug-86 02:27:49 EDT
References: <8608292114.AA18102@cory.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: grr@cbmvax.UUCP (George Robbins)
Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA
Lines: 28

In article <8608292114.AA18102@cory.Berkeley.EDU> you write:
>	"Originally planning for a separate issue of the magazine,
>	we put together a series of articles exploring the MC68000
>	and many of the machines it powers.  Those articles make up
>	this month's theme section and the continuing coverage of the
>	MC68000 that will appear in our Features section over the next
>	several months."
>					-G. Michael Vose, Sen. Tech editor
>					 themes.
>					 (BYTE september 86 v11-n9)
>
>	Well, you can't have everything.  Seems strange that the Themes
>	editor would say something like that (especially the last line)..
>	Looks like the policy decision caused some disention at BYTE.
>
>						-Matt


You can probably translate that as:

We were planning on doing a special 68000 issue, but our advertising people
couldn't sell enough space in a 68000 only issue to justify the expense...

... just a guess, but Byte is anything but non-profit...
-- 
George Robbins - now working with,	uucp: {ihnp4|seismo|caip}!cbmvax!grr
but no way officially representing	arpa: cbmvax!grr@seismo.css.GOV
Commodore, Engineering Department	fone: 215-431-9255 (only by moonlite)