Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!pyramid!amiga!cbmvax!daveh From: daveh@cbmvax.cbm.UUCP (Dave Haynie) Newsgroups: net.micro.68k,net.micro.mac,net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: Re: BYTE issue of September 86 focuses on the 68000 Message-ID: <711@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> Date: Tue, 9-Sep-86 15:36:01 EDT Article-I.D.: cbmvax.711 Posted: Tue Sep 9 15:36:01 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 10-Sep-86 19:59:26 EDT References: <213@dione.rice.EDU> Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA Lines: 30 Xref: mnetor net.micro.68k:1202 net.micro.mac:6941 net.micro.amiga:4602 > Xref: cbmvax net.micro.68k:253 net.micro.mac:2584 net.micro.amiga:2500 > > Also, somewhere in this issue is a box detailing all the things that one > must do to resize a window (on a Macintosh and on an Amiga). This is > presented as a comparison, supposedly demonstrating that the Amiga is > better than the Macintosh because you have to do less to resize a window. > The operation was expressed as one step for the Amiga, seven (more or > less, I don't have it in front of me) for the Macintosh. > > This is misleading, because in any application that I have ever written, > that code appeared once and only once. Ignored is the possibility that the > Macintosh method allows greater flexibility, etc. A casual, uninformed > reader would conclude that the Amiga was better, and that was the intent > of the demonstration. > > This is yellow journalism to the max, and certainly worthy of The National > Inquirer. All in the guise of objectivity. > > I quit buying BYTE years ago... > scott -- /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Dave Haynie {caip,ihnp4,allegra,seismo}!cbmvax!daveh "I gained nothing at all from Supreme Enlightenment, and for that very reason it is called Supreme Enlightenment." -Gotama Buddha These opinions are my own, though for a small fee they be yours too. \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/