Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!caip!cbmvax!daveh From: daveh@cbmvax.cbm.UUCP (Dave Haynie) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: Re: Ultimate Computers Message-ID: <745@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> Date: Wed, 17-Sep-86 12:04:31 EDT Article-I.D.: cbmvax.745 Posted: Wed Sep 17 12:04:31 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 19-Sep-86 22:26:52 EDT References: <180@zen.BERKELEY.EDU> Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA Lines: 52 > Speaking of ultimate computers, the Apple GS now exists; can anyone offer > a comparison with the A1000? All I know so far is that the GS is slower > and II compatible, and gray ("platinum"). Apple II compatibility is like > making a race-car Volkswagen compatible, but it could help business. The GS graphics are closer to the Amiga's than most things around, at least from the viewpoint of the 4096 colors. That's 16 simultaneous at 320x200, 4 at 640x200; nothing earthshaking there. I expected them to have some kind of graphics assist, like a blitter, but so far everything I've read describes the video chip as a "controller", not a "co-processor". They have some kind of facility available for changing the color mapping on the fly, the 16 colors are fixed for every horizontal line. It sounds more like having the Amiga's copper change the register values after each scan line than our HAM mode, though its possible they's got a faster way (too early to tell, I've got a few ideas on that). The video chip operates only in the 128K of dedicated video RAM; the PCB also has another 128K available to the 65C816. This processor is running at 2.8MHz; kind of a cop-out, they're probably paying for 4MHz parts, though as of recently real 4MHz parts were kind of hand-selected from the 2MHz bin. The 65C816 itself is externally very much like a 65C02; though is provides an extra 4 bits of address, it still has an 8 bit only bus. I'd expect it to run much like an 8088; it has more addressing modes but fewer instructions. The 2.8MHz 65C816 runs a bus cycle equivalent to a 10.4MHz 8088 or 68008. It doesn't have any multiply instructions, and is kind of anit-RISC in that almost every instruction can access memory; there's 1 general purpose register, 2 index registers, and a few block segment registers (1 for data, 1 for program). The GP register can be set up for either 8 or 16 bit operation; this requires 1 instruction to switch. The sound chip is made by Ensoniq, a company started by a bunch of old CBM folks -- this could be the best feature of the machine; the Ensoniq folks make commercial synthesizers for a living. Can reportedly do 15 voices, though I've no idea how much uP time is needed to use it effectively. Anyway, overall this machine is probably good news for all those old Apple ][e enthusiasts. It could have been competition for the PC back in the old days, as I believe overall it'll run faster than a standard PC. I doubt it'll look that great next to the 16 bit bus machines, though of course recall that unlike much of the current 68000 machine software, much of that old Apple stuff is written in tight machine code. By the way, the computer's demo is a rotating picture of the computer itself. And guess who's on the screen of the rotating picture -- you've got it, our old friend Boing!, bouncing up and down (don't know how fast). Anyone want to write a comeback program? -- /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Dave Haynie {caip,ihnp4,allegra,seismo}!cbmvax!daveh "I gained nothing at all from Supreme Enlightenment, and for that very reason it is called Supreme Enlightenment." -Gotama Buddha These opinions are my own, though for a small fee they be yours too. \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/