Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!gatech!akgua!lcuxlm!whuxl!houxm!mhuxt!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!aglew
From: aglew@ccvaxa.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.hp
Subject: Re: Integrals, anyone?
Message-ID: <17600002@ccvaxa>
Date: Tue, 9-Sep-86 20:56:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ccvaxa.17600002
Posted: Tue Sep  9 20:56:00 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 11-Sep-86 07:26:27 EDT
References: <1160@jade>
Lines: 19
Nf-ID: #R:jade:-116000:ccvaxa:17600002:000:836
Nf-From: ccvaxa.UUCP!aglew    Sep  9 19:56:00 1986


> 	Most of the original software team for the Integral and the 
> people who continue to support it read this notefile. 
> 	It is nice to see some notes regarding the Integral (good and
> bad - at least it is being used :-)). 
> 
> Karen Helt

My question about the Integral, and I don't mean to embarass anyone or
be unkind, is: what went wrong? Why didn't the Integral take off? 
I remember how excited I was when it came out, but I was short on cash
then; now that I have the money, it seems that it would be silly to
buy a machine that nobody else buys. Are people like me, who would
like a portable UNIX machine, so rare?

If you want to respond, please e-mail -- I rarely read net.micro.hp

Andy "Krazy" Glew. Gould CSD-Urbana.    USEnet:  ihnp4!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!aglew
1101 E. University, Urbana, IL 61801    ARPAnet: aglew@gswd-vms