Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mcvax!ukc!rde
From: rde@ukc.ac.uk (R.D.Eager)
Newsgroups: net.emacs,net.micro,net.micro.pc
Subject: Re: MicroEMACS 3.7 response
Message-ID: <1786@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 18-Aug-86 18:59:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: eagle.1786
Posted: Mon Aug 18 18:59:54 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 21-Aug-86 01:24:01 EDT
References: <1774@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> <624@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>
Reply-To: rde@ukc.ac.uk (R.D.Eager)
Organization: U of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury, UK
Lines: 23
Xref: mnetor net.emacs:1413 net.micro:5885 net.micro.pc:6218


[food for line eater]

Many  thanks  to  those  who  replied  to  my query about MicroEMACS 3.7
response on a PC-compatible. I had already tried for the retrace  delay,
but it didn't make a whole lot of difference...just snow.

Thanks to 'Ron' - I can't find his reply now. The problem was that I was
using the L model (large code and large data) because I couldn't get the
D  model  (small  code, large data) into 64K of code. He suggested using
the -s compiler  switch  which  tells  the  compiler  not  to  normalise
pointers; this speeded it up *and* got it under 64K so I could use the D
model and speed it up even more!

It's fine now. Thanks!
-- 
           Bob Eager

           rde@ukc.UUCP
           rde@ukc
           ...!mcvax!ukc!rde

           Phone: +44 227 66822 ext 7589