Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!topaz!husc6!harvard!rclex!drilex!axiom!linus!raybed2!rayssdb!iws
From: iws@rayssdb.UUCP (Ihor W. Slabicky)
Newsgroups: net.misc
Subject: Re: Re: Coke, classic coke and new coke
Message-ID: <1250@rayssdb.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 4-Sep-86 12:25:31 EDT
Article-I.D.: rayssdb.1250
Posted: Thu Sep  4 12:25:31 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 8-Sep-86 01:45:41 EDT
References: <332@encore.UUCP> <115@eneevax.UUCP> <916@batcomputer.TN.CORNELL.EDU> <127@eneevax.UUCP> <807@ihuxa.UUCP>
Sender: iws@rayssdb.UUCP (Ihor W. Slabicky @ Raytheon Co., Portsmouth RI)
Organization: Raytheon Co., Portsmouth RI
Lines: 20

> As far as the old Coke<>Coke Classic debate goes, my husband was an old Coke
> addict of long standing.  He can't stand Coke Classic...
> 	Vickie Klick AT&T Bell Laboratories, Naperville, IL
> 	...ihnp4!ihuxa!klick

Hey now, wait a minute!  I thought that old Coke = Coke Classic.
Now you are saying that they are NOT THE SAME!?!?  WTFIGO?
You mean there was Coke, which was replaced by new Coke, but since
new Coke tasted so bad, Coke Classic was added but Coke Classic is
not the same as the original Coke even though Coca-Cola said it was?!

(by the way - if someone would send me a can of Jolt Cola, I'd appreciate 
it - it could even be empty!)

(by the way - does anyone here collect old soda pop bottles?)

        ... {allegra, gatech, ihnp4, linus, raybed2} !rayssd!rayssdb!iws
      Ihor Slabicky MS 171 * Raytheon Company * Submarine Signal Division
      P.O. Box 360 * Portsmouth, RI 02871-0360 * (401) 847-8000 ext. 5684
1234567890               !#$%^&*()_-+={[}]~`:;"'|\<,>.?/              0987654321