Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version VT1.00C 11/1/84; site vortex.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!vortex!lauren From: lauren@vortex.UUCP (Lauren Weinstein) Newsgroups: net.news.adm Subject: Stargate Message-ID: <950@vortex.UUCP> Date: Fri, 15-Aug-86 15:04:49 EDT Article-I.D.: vortex.950 Posted: Fri Aug 15 15:04:49 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 17-Aug-86 07:47:06 EDT Organization: Vortex Technology, Los Angeles Lines: 44 The following represents my personal opinions. The current indications are that (given proper pricing) it will almost always be in a site's advantage to participate directly in Stargate whenever possible (via cable TV feed or sat receiver) rather than try rely on other sites for phone feeds of certain classes of Stargate materials. Among many other benefits, those sites receiving materials directly from the broadcast channel will always be at an advantage when it comes to participation in discussions in a timely manner. Especially as the number of sites and traffic grows, the broadcast channel will be increasingly attractive even to very small sites (including one person and "read-only" sites). The amount of coordination, money, and time it takes operate a phone-based hub, especially in major metropolitan areas where there may be many potential users, is rapidly becoming impractical. Part of the reason for the many "non-local" netnews links on the current network is that existing local "hubs" are often unable to reasonably handle more than a relatively few sites without considerable system, resource, delivery latency, and/or other cost effects. And of course the current "solution" to this problem, involving sites feeding sites feeding other sites in a fanout arrangement, only increases the problems with article delivery delays. This in turn is made worse by the lack of moderation for most materials, yet this very arrangement makes moderation difficult to use effectively in the existing environment. With Stargate, on the other hand, there is no direct incremental cost (to the network) for adding another receiving site. There is no delivery load placed on existing receiving sites by other sites joining the cable/satellite network. The fact that all operational sites receive the same broadcast material at the same time will allow moderation, at various levels, to work much more effectively than in a phone-based network--an important facet as traffic, sites, and users continue to grow in numbers. The broadcast nature of Stargate offers tremendous potential for supporting many more sites and users in a useful manner than could be supported in a non-broadcast environment. This will allow for the participation of many organizations and users who would not otherwise be reasonably able to contribute to and benefit from the quality people/knowledge/information resources that can be made available. --Lauren--