Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!caip!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!vortex!lauren From: lauren@vortex.UUCP (Lauren Weinstein) Newsgroups: net.news.adm Subject: Stargate Message-ID: <953@vortex.UUCP> Date: Fri, 29-Aug-86 17:03:26 EDT Article-I.D.: vortex.953 Posted: Fri Aug 29 17:03:26 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 30-Aug-86 21:32:59 EDT Organization: Vortex Technology, Los Angeles Lines: 33 I just had another conversation with SSS regarding scrambling issues. As I mentioned in my previous message, they are *not* thrilled about scrambling. A primary reason many advertiser-sponsored services are being prodded into scrambling is threats from cable systems to drop them if they don't scramble. It's these kinds of threats that Congress is investigating, by the way. I did confirm three points: 1) The vertical interval data survives videocipher scrambling, at least when descrambled with the "commercial" decoders (which are slightly more expensive than the consumer decoders). There is no reason to believe the consumer decoders will have any problems in this regard, though I'll be in a position to test this for sure with SSS shortly. 2) While pressure has been building for SSS to begin fixed-key scrambling testing in a couple of months (in fixed-key mode, anybody with a videocipher box can receive the video without specific addressing), there is no specific date planned at this point for addressable scrambling, which requires considerably more work to make operational. 3) I have been told again that the issue of data subscribers not being happy with the possibility of having to pay the same key rates as conventional WTBS viewers (even if those rates are relatively small) is understood and that all efforts will be made to deal with this issue in an appropriate manner. Once again, I emphasize that these scrambling issues only affect direct reception of SSS data via satellite receiver, NOT those persons who would receive the data via cable systems. --Lauren--