Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!caip!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!sdcsvax!sdcc6!sdsioa!brunner From: brunner@sdsioa.UUCP (Rob Brunner) Newsgroups: net.puzzle,net.sci Subject: A heavy problem (possibilities) Message-ID: <168@sdsioa.UUCP> Date: Mon, 11-Aug-86 19:59:53 EDT Article-I.D.: sdsioa.168 Posted: Mon Aug 11 19:59:53 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 15-Aug-86 01:16:13 EDT References: <1033@mmm.UUCP> <3093@ism780c.UUCP> <2939@sdcrdcf.UUCP> Organization: UC San Diego, Scripps Institution of Oceanography Lines: 34 Xref: watmath net.puzzle:1982 net.sci:1499 >In fact, the raven says he can't think of _anything_ that would be >taller and thinner under higher gravity. If anyone can think of >something, or can refute the raven on some point, I'd be happy to hear >of it. How about womens' ears (whazzat??). Or anything with something hanging for that matter. Earrings tend to pull down on the ears... with higher G they would stretch the suckers out, wouldn't they? 8-) As for thinner: it seems anything with a T type shape would be thinner, yes? The Big G would pull down on the outsides of the T and make whatever it is thinner. (remember your circles) In some sort of extreme context: something in the general set-up of: | would tend to become: | / \ | | / \ | | A B A B In some sense, the gravity between A and B would cause this distorted shape and thus if each /, \, or | has the same length, whatever it is is now taller. (circles again :-)) Does any of this make any sense, or is my keyboard just foaming at the mouth? -- Rob Brunner email: Scripps Institution of Oceanography brunner@sdsioa.UUCP Mail Code A-010, UC San Diego sdsioa!brunner@sdcsvax San Diego, CA 92093 {backbone}!sdcsvax!sdsioa!brunner Phone: (619) 534-2040 (work) (619) 452-7656 (home)