Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!topaz!uwvax!husc6!ut-sally!pyramid!pesnta!valid!pete
From: pete@valid.UUCP (Pete Zakel)
Newsgroups: net.sci,net.politics
Subject: Re: privatization of education
Message-ID: <590@valid.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 18-Aug-86 19:24:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: valid.590
Posted: Mon Aug 18 19:24:44 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 20-Aug-86 01:38:02 EDT
References: <2413@brl-smoke.ARPA> <2777@sdcc6.ucsd.EDU>
Organization: Valid Logic, San Jose, CA
Lines: 25
Xref: watmath net.sci:1524 net.politics:18420

[stuff deleted]
> > Ah, Clayton.  Always ready to misinterpret a rhetorical argument.
> 
> [more stuff deleted]
> 
> > Obviously, the correct inference is that YOU have no rational conviction
> > behind it.  Assuming, of course, that you really do have such a passionate
> > belief.  Judging from your writings, you might well allow genocide if it was
> > a free-market phenominon.  :-)
> > 
> 
> I demand an immediate retraction of this libel.  Show ONE SINGLE POSTING
> I HAVE EVER DONE THAT BACKS UP THIS LIE OF YOURS, OR I WILL FIND OUT WHAT
> BASIS I HAVE FOR A LAWSUIT.
> 
> > Mike Huybensz
> 
> Clayton E. Cramer

Oh, pish and tosh.  Clayton, you have NO grounds for libel whatsoever.  How
anyone could prove libel from a statement of the form "Judging from X, A
might permit Y if Z were true" is just beyond me.  Talk about over-reaction.
And how can you ignore the smiley (which you even included in the quote)?
-- 
-Pete Zakel (..!{hplabs,?}!ridge!valid!pete) (member of HASA)