Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!sri-spam!parcvax!hplabs!pesnta!amd!amdcad!amdimage!prls!philabs!linus!raybed2!applicon!hdsvx1!hoffman From: hoffman@hdsvx1.UUCP (Richard Hoffman) Newsgroups: net.legal,net.books,net.social Subject: Re: Re: Banning Books and Bibles Message-ID: <432@hdsvx1.UUCP> Date: Wed, 13-Aug-86 17:27:27 EDT Article-I.D.: hdsvx1.432 Posted: Wed Aug 13 17:27:27 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 17-Aug-86 05:47:55 EDT References: <968@hoptoad.uucp> Organization: Schlumberger-HDS, Houston TX Lines: 39 Xref: mnetor net.legal:3241 net.books:2478 net.social:818 Tim Maroney writes: > It is a total mystery to me how anyone could miss the message of Huckleberry > Finn with respect to racism ... At one point there is an accident. The > dialogue goes pretty much like this: > > Southern Lady: "Oh, my goodness! Was anyone hurt?" > Man: "No ma'am. A nigger got killed." > Lady: "Well, that's good, because sometimes people do get hurt." > > A fairly unambiguous interchange, no? I'm sorry, I don't understand. Are you saying this passage demonstrates the racism of Twain (because these are really his sentiments) or the anti-racism of Twain (because he is satirizing the racist attitude)? It's clear from the rest of the book and from his other writings that Twain was against slavery, and in general believed that Negros are entitled to fair, human treatment, but it's not at all clear that Twain believed that blacks and whites were equal in all respects. In any case, my point is that satire is often confusing, because it allows ideas to stand on their own idiocy. A Klansman, shown merely the passage you quoted above, might come away with a warm feeling about Twain. To appreciate the passage as satire, you have to have the moral sense to know that the Southern Lady has the wrong attitude. A lot of passages in Twain present the same difficulty to young readers. (I knew of some parents who were so scandalized by Jonathan Swift's "Modest Proposal" that they tried to have the assigning teacher fired for advocating Satanism). But this difficulty cannot be remedied by banning the book from school libraries, because then, when the student encounters the book later on, he will *know* that there is something scandalous about it because it was banned! The solution is to educate students so that they can recognize devices such as satire and parody, and to make sure difficult (because ambiguous) passages are discussed under proper guidance. After all, we don't study literature to learn how to read -- we study it to learn how to understand what we read. -- Richard Hoffman | "Oh life is a wonderful cycle of song, Schlumberger Well Services | A medley of extemporanea. hoffman%hdsvx1@slb-doll.csnet | And Love is a thing that can never go wrong PO Box 2175, Houston, TX 77252 | ... And I am Marie of Roumania." --D. PARKER