Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!sri-spam!parcvax!hplabs!tektronix!tekgen!tektools!richl From: richl@tektools.UUCP (Rick Lindsley) Newsgroups: net.singles,net.social,net.women Subject: Re: Saying things about your SO on the net Message-ID: <1432@tektools.UUCP> Date: Wed, 3-Sep-86 01:13:57 EDT Article-I.D.: tektools.1432 Posted: Wed Sep 3 01:13:57 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 4-Sep-86 06:31:48 EDT References: <6688@sri-spam.ARPA> Reply-To: richl@tektools.UUCP (Rick Lindsley) Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR. Lines: 72 Xref: watmath net.singles:16155 net.social:1383 net.women:12577 In article <6688@sri-spam.ARPA> gds@sri-spam.ARPA (The lost Bostonian) asks: > I was > wondering though how other people whose SO's or spouses occasionally > read about themselves on the net, or who other netters meet > occasionally, feel about posting personal details about their SO's or > spouses. I've had an SO who was famous on the net. I think I was harder on my own postings than hers. In case she is reading, all of the examples I am giving are just that, examples. DO NOT read anything into these!! We talked about this very problem, and I asked that we not refer to each other by names because 1) it would call attention to ourselves, and I'm not really that kind of person, and 2) if we *did* want to get an opinion from the net, we might get a more objective opinion if they didn't know who that other person was. I'm not ashamed of her, nor she of me. I just dislike publicity. > Do you generally ask permission before posting? No, but we trust each other to be sensitive. We both would find it offensive, I think, to first learn of some problem in the relationship through an article. ("I've got this problem with my SO that we've never really discussed, and I'm wondering if my thinking on this is right or wrong and should I even bother to bring it up ..." [you just did!]) > Are there > certain things about your relationship you wouldn't post? Certainly. As I said, I'm harder on myself than on her. There are things I probably wouldn't post, but which if she posts doesn't particularly bother me. There are some things, though, that would bother me. For instance, it wouldn't bother me if she said her SO was tall or short or pudgy or thin, or went to college or generalities like that. Probably even stuff like "he's got this mole and it's shaped like a ..." wouldn't be annoying. But things that put me down (and I admit this is subjective!) would annoy me a great deal. ("He's fun and witty, but he has absolutely no originality" would probably prompt a private discussion. Don't talk about me in the third person! I might add that to keep things completely inconsistent, I would not chastize her if she stopped at the comma. [C'mon, I'm only human.]) > Do you think > this affects other people's perceptions of your SO? That's one of the main reasons I've rarely, if ever, mentioned her name. A few other net people know who she is, I'm sure, and she is friends with several of them. I don't know what their perception of her is, and it is not my place to ask, or change it. I would not want others, who *don't* know her, to use my obviously biased (either favorably or unfavorably -- depends on my mood at the time!) opinions as a basis for judging her. I would *never* say anything intentionally degrading about her, no matter what the reason. I would take it up in private (like all good netters should do :-)) > Do you think if you > are critical of your SO on the net that you are not giving them a chance > to defend themselves. Yes, in part. Criticize in private, praise in public, I always say. I always *try* to do that, though being human I'm sure I've not always been successful. Our personal differences need to be worked out between *us*. If she wants to discuss it privately with her net friends, that doesn't bother me. But to post them to net.singles seems to be creating an election I didn't campaign for and have no control over ("well, 35 people have responded and 23 thought he was a jerk and 12 thought I was too hard on him. That's pretty much what I thought; I think I'll go talk with him now." yecch. I've read all about it by now; spare me.) Rick