Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!caip!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!j.cc.purdue.edu!h.cc.purdue.edu!pur-phy!mrstve!rjk
From: rjk@mrstve.UUCP (Richard Kuhns)
Newsgroups: net.text,net.unix
Subject: Re: Use of ``vi'' for business office word-processing
Message-ID: <252@mrstve.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 8-Sep-86 08:48:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: mrstve.252
Posted: Mon Sep  8 08:48:55 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 9-Sep-86 06:22:43 EDT
References: <1246@kitty.UUCP>
Reply-To: rjk@mrstve.UUCP (Richard Kuhns)
Organization: Mr sTVe's, Lafayette IN
Lines: 33
Keywords: ``vi'' word-processing non-programmers
Xref: mnetor net.text:947 net.unix:5418

In article <1246@kitty.UUCP> larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) writes:
>
>	On occasion I get asked for my opinion on computer systems for small
>business applications.  Since 100% of my computer applications are scientific
	[ ... ]
>	At the moment I am being compelled to offer an opinion on a computer
>system for a medium-sized law office; they want to start out small, and do
>not want to spend the money for a law office automation system (like a product
>of Barrister Information Systems).  For three or four secretaries (and to allow
>for growth), I am inclined to recommend a 3B2 or NCR Tower XP as the most
>COST-EFFECTIVE means of implementing a multi-user system.  Comments, anyone?
>
>==>  Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp., Clarence, New York
>==>  UUCP:  {allegra|decvax|rocksanne|rocksvax|watmath}!sunybcs!kitty!larry
>==>  VOICE: 716/688-1231           {hplabs|ihnp4|seismo|utzoo}!/
>==>  FAX:   716/741-9635 {G1,G2,G3}      "Have you hugged your cat today?" 

I wouldn't have any problem recommending a 3B2 for the circumstances you've
described -- we started with a 3B2/300 about 1 1/2 years ago, upgraded it
to a 310, and have been satisfied enough that we've added 2 3B2/400s since.
The worst problem we've had has been a bad memory card, which was replaced
within 2 days (not bad, considering it went bad during the strike).
(I didn't mention it, but we are using them in an office environment).
Multi-user support is very good, by which I mean that you (I) don't notice
much system degradation as several people log in, unless they're running
very disk-intensive operations (the system definitely starts dragging
then).

My feelings about word processing are similar to yours, except I favor
EMACS (JOVE, to be precise).  We aren't heavily into word processing, but so
far vi and/or jove has been sufficient.
-- 
Rich Kuhns		{ihnp4, decvax, etc...}!pur-ee!pur-phy!mrstve!rjk