Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcs!utfyzx!harrison From: harrison@utfyzx.UUCP Newsgroups: net.text,net.unix Subject: Re: Use of ``vi'' for business office word-processing Message-ID: <1986Sep10.070531.15353@utfyzx.uucp> Date: Wed, 10-Sep-86 07:05:31 EDT Article-I.D.: utfyzx.1986Sep10.070531.15353 Posted: Wed Sep 10 07:05:31 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 10-Sep-86 19:16:43 EDT References: <1246@kitty.UUCP> Reply-To: harrison@utfyzx.UUCP (David Harrison) Organization: Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Toronto Lines: 28 Keywords: ``vi'' word-processing non-programmers Xref: utcs net.text:1315 net.unix:9064 In article <1246@kitty.UUCP> larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) writes: > So my question is: Am I WRONG in advising people to stay with ``vi'' >and not spend money for "word-processing software" in the BUSINESS APPLICATION >environment? I have been involved in word-processing in the Physics Dept. Because of the math requirements, WYSIWIG's were pretty well excluded, so we used eqn, tbl, and troff. Once the decision to use an embedded-command WP system was made, we had to teach our secretaries an editor, and found that there was little problem in using "vi". So, I would tend to say that you are not wrong. As to WYSIWIG vs. embedded-command WP systems, net.text is the appropritate forum for that discussion. However: we also found that teaching "vi" first led to some blocks in our users learning naked UNIX that were removed if we taught them "ed" first. This is now pretty general for me: I teach users good-old "ed", and when they are fairly comfortable show them "vi". Thus, they get exposed to UNIX regular expressions, etc., before going full-screen. ( I also use sh, not csh, to give you some idea of my prejudices in these matters. ) I suspect that the success of our teaching of "ed" was partly aided by the fact that we use the "U of T Zoology" version of it, which includes an excellent line-editing mode, browsing commands, and other nice features. I've never tried to teach a naive user vanilla ed. -- David Harrison, Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Toronto {ihnp4,utzoo}!utcs!utfyzx!harrison