Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!caip!cbmvax!higgin From: higgin@cbmvax.cbm.UUCP (Paul Higginbottom) Newsgroups: net.text,net.unix Subject: Re: Use of ``vi'' for business office word-processing Message-ID: <738@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> Date: Tue, 16-Sep-86 01:17:52 EDT Article-I.D.: cbmvax.738 Posted: Tue Sep 16 01:17:52 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 16-Sep-86 05:55:58 EDT References: <1246@kitty.UUCP> <709@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> <874@ssc-vax.UUCP> Reply-To: higgin@cbmvax.UUCP (Paul Higginbottom) Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA Lines: 50 Xref: mnetor net.text:982 net.unix:5498 In article <874@ssc-vax.UUCP> brian@ssc-vax.UUCP (Brian Fenske) writes: >(repeats what I wrote)... >> I personally would suggest getting each person an IBM-PC compatible type of >> machine. There's a million and one different word processors for it, and >> some are extremely nice to use, definitely with the comuter-illiterate in >> mind. They ACT like typewriters, but the secretary CAN at his/her pace learn >> to use mail merge, sorts, search/replace, type of features later. >> >> P.S - remember, even if they get PC's they can still network, share >> hard disks, printers, etc. True they won't have electronic mail, but I >> personally think Unix has a long way to go before it will really be >> palatable in the normal business environment. Don't get me wrong though, >> *I* LOVE Unix. >> >(then Brian responded with)... >Why make the poor secretaries learn MS-DOS? A network of Macintoshes >can provide all of the office needs you mentioned, Paul, and they can >have electronic mail to boot (InBox from Think Technologies). My >secretary was about as computer-illiterate as you can get but she >picked up her new Mac and was blasting out memos and spreadsheets and >using Email in a day or two. > >BTW, don't get me wrong either. I also love Unix. > >I have no affiliation with Apple or Think Technologies (and >certainly not with IBM :-)) > >Brian Fenske Boeing Aerospace Company >UUCP: uw-beaver!ssc-vax!brian Seattle, Washington Brian, I agree with you about Macs, Apple has done a nice job with their networking; it's SIMPLE, but not crude. I've been to a place where they had about 6 or 7 Macs sharing a couple of hard disks (Profiles?) and a Laser printer. It worked very well for them. I merely suggested PC's because of the pricing (they're almost being given away) and because I don't personally believe that Macs are for everyone. While there is keyboard phobia out there, there is also mouse phobia. At least people know what a keyboard is! True, true, it doesn't take long to get the point across, but its another abstraction. Let's not get into a discussion as to whether Macs or PC's are better - they can both do the job well, in different ways. I have found this debate fascinating, it has moved with religious zeal! Paul. Disclaimer: opinions expressed are mine only, although you may have them for free!