Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rochester!ritcv!moscom!noemi From: noemi@moscom.UUCP (Noemi Berry) Newsgroups: net.text,net.unix Subject: Re: Use of ``vi'' for business office word-processing Message-ID: <750@moscom.UUCP> Date: Tue, 16-Sep-86 07:39:57 EDT Article-I.D.: moscom.750 Posted: Tue Sep 16 07:39:57 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 17-Sep-86 06:06:51 EDT Distribution: net Organization: MOSCOM Corp, E Rochester, NY, USA Lines: 37 Xref: mnetor net.text:989 net.unix:5515 Summary: Expires: References: <1246@kitty.UUCP> <709@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> <1986Sep8.085454.25126@utcs.uucp> Sender: Reply-To: noemi@moscom.UUCP (Noemi Berry) Followup-To: Organization: Moscom, East Rochester, NY Keywords: ``vi'' word-processing non-programmers >>> So my question is: Am I WRONG in advising people to stay with ``vi'' >>>and not spend money for "word-processing software" in the BUSINESS >>>APPLICATION environment? >>Yes, I think you're wrong. Secretaries don't have time, nor do they usually >>want to learn something like Unix. They will prefer EVERY TIME something >>which works as similarly as possible to their typewriter. >>[...] >>Paul. >I think that you are wrong, Paul. >[...] >One need not even let the secretary know that Unix is the system she >is working on. [...] A customized environment is not a bad way to go >in UNIX provided there is a clever administrator. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >Mark And what average law firm or office *has* this clever administrator? Who wants to devote a lot of time (read: money) to learning a system that for office word-processing purposes is really overkill? Even in companies with lots of computer-literate people, the word-processing is better off done in more idiot-proof environments. UNIX *can't* be beat for R&D, but for a typical office environment where the most knowledgable computer person really could be a secretary? I'd recommend something *meant* for businesses. noemi berry {allegra|seismo}!rochester!moscom!noemi