Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!husc6!seismo!ll-xn!adelie!mirror!gabriel!inmet!janw
From: janw@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Affirm.Action
Message-ID: <7802371@inmet>
Date: Thu, 11-Sep-86 10:21:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: inmet.7802371
Posted: Thu Sep 11 10:21:00 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 15-Sep-86 05:33:57 EDT
References: <20811@styx.UUCP>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:styx.UUCP:-2081100:inmet:7802371:000:465
Nf-From: inmet.UUCP!janw    Sep 11 10:21:00 1986


[lazarus@brahms.UUCP ]
In article <20811@styx.UUCP> mcb@styx.UUCP (Michael C. Berch) writes:
>>[...]
>>[NOW, NAACP, liberal govt. says] "Quality, who cares?"

>You say "EQuality, who cares?"

When quality is the only criterion, this is one kind of equality.
Two  boxers  aren't  equal  -  one  of them wins. But they can be
treated equally by the referee.

Do we need any other kind of equality? There's no consensus
on that, so leave that decision to individuals.