Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!cit-vax!elroy!smeagol!usc-oberon!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
From: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,net.legal,net.singles
Subject: Re: Attorney General's Commission on Pornography
Message-ID: <1440@psivax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 16-Sep-86 16:40:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: psivax.1440
Posted: Tue Sep 16 16:40:28 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 19-Sep-86 21:41:51 EDT
References: <777@mtund.UUCP>
Reply-To: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Distribution: net
Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA
Lines: 23
Xref: mnetor talk.politics.misc:163 net.legal:3592 net.singles:10374

In article <777@mtund.UUCP> adam@mtund.UUCP (Adam V. Reed) writes:

>The study Mark refers to was conducted like this: Some male college
>students are given an attitude survey. They are then crowded into a
>small, darkened room, and made to view a piece of violent pornography on
>a flickering movie projector. They are then given the attitude survey
>again, and, presto, they appear more willing to disregard the sexual
>rights of women. How come?

	Did you say *crowded*?! *Crowded*! Just being in a crowded
room, in and of itself, with no other stimulus, is quite capable of
making me less concerned about other people! You should see what a
traffic jam does to my driving! After a few minutes I will do
*anything* to keep moving, no matter what it does to other people.
Sheesh! This beats the violent-crime/pornography study I looked at for
poor technique! And it got *published*! How? Wasn't it a refereed
journal?
---

				Sarima (Stanley Friesen)

UUCP: {ttidca|ihnp4|sdcrdcf|quad1|nrcvax|bellcore|logico}!psivax!friesen
ARPA: ??