Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!yale!husc6!caip!clyde!watmath!watnot!watdcsu!dmcanzi
From: dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi)
Newsgroups: net.religion,talk.religion
Subject: Re: Banning books, religion etc...
Message-ID: <2516@watdcsu.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 4-Sep-86 17:51:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: watdcsu.2516
Posted: Thu Sep  4 17:51:48 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 9-Sep-86 05:44:30 EDT
References: <1637@ames.UUCP> <180@BMS-AT.UUCP>
Reply-To: dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi)
Distribution: net
Organization: Secular Humanist Conspiracy, Child Corruption Division
Lines: 11
Xref: linus net.religion:10723 talk.religion:56

In article <180@BMS-AT.UUCP> stuart@BMS-AT.UUCP (Stuart D. Gathman) writes:
>When I first heard about the horror of pornography, I went out and 
>found a copy of Playboy.  I avoided the pictures (hoping to have a happy
>marriage someday) and read several articles.  My conclusion: the articles
>were typical of magazines and only occasionally disgusting.  People must
>buy it for the pictures. ...

If Playboy's articles are typical of other magazines, and people only
buy Playboy for the pictures, then why do people buy other magazines?
-- 
David Canzi			"... don't see the fnords ..."